Today I heard her say, "the council decides and does as he wishes, because it represents the people."
I must say that this speech is a mantra repeat that we feel, at all levels, and at every moment: the consent, after it is acquired through an election, seems to be considered by elected a kind of indelible mark, which allows each decision, each and every type of behavior will.
The idea that a large group of citizens did not agree on the work started on the close, which are disputed and finds them unnecessary, unnecessarily expensive and lacking the spirit of the place, left completely untouched by the spokespersons of the Mayor, in absence of official statements of the mayor himself.
Any further verification of the popular will becomes a mere waste of time, indeed a real unnecessary activity that threatens to disrupt the perfect confidence of yourself and your work, which is the basis for each share of so-called policy. The democratic debate
also has to deal with dissent, and perhaps most importantly with the dissent pretends to listen, although they were still in the belief that others do not have a say "because I am me, and you are not a c. .. zo"
has nothing to do with democracy, neither real nor virtual.
Despite statements by the Mayor on several occasions, N o one of the observations LEGAMBIENTE 'WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT neither by nor by the designers, the ones and the others are restricted to want to "illustrate" a project that without false modesty, we know very well and telling us that, ultimately, happily works "architecture" could be dismantled without too much trouble. How
who said "we want to throw away money? We decided to rush hour and if you decide to throw more then."
do not think there is a need for further comment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment